03-27-2022, 05:04 PM
(03-27-2022, 04:27 PM)AARGANN Wrote: It's weird to see a little boy with few years in chess game beats a master. that means a talent (Prodigy) not aquired but born with him. You cant beat these kids. and of course they are very few in the world, but they exist.
I found a Masterclass course of Kasparov teaching his gameplay and tactics.
On February 10, 1996, after three hours, world chess champion Garry Kasparov loses the first game of a six-game match against Deep Blue, an IBM computer capable of evaluating 200 million moves per second
. HISTORY WEBSITE
Now with AI it is not possible to beat the machine.
wow 2 decades. Maybe if you read chess books and followed the courses of the master you may get that 90 percent.
I believe geniuses are made, not born. Actually also chess used to prove this theory by Polgar who is chess teacher and Psychologist in the same time. He raised 2 girls Judit and Zsusan polgar. Judit known as strongest woman player in the history and only woman which can compete and beat world champions! both become grand masters Zsusan is woman world champion while Judit reject to play in woman only championships !
Anyway, there is some level in chess you cant break without study plan. As example player i know dedicated 4 hours a day for 1 year to study chess (not including playing) he become better 2100 > 2400 (lichess rate) but he still not masters level. he play for club and i guess i can say he is smart at least he was in school and college!
For me i did spent some time on learning and i watch youtube analyzes of top games by masters but to be honest study is boring and i have no tolerance to do it regularly and for long time
If you cant see except what lights show you and cant hare except what sounds announced
then you are far away from truth in this world.