Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass

Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - Printable Version

+- Arabian Servers Counter Strike 1.6 (https://www.arabian-servers.com)
+-- Forum: General - عام (https://www.arabian-servers.com/forum-171.html)
+--- Forum: Off Topics / نقاشات (https://www.arabian-servers.com/forum-37.html)
+--- Thread: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass (/thread-22340.html)

Pages: 1 2

Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - Tesco Value - 06-15-2022

I see alot of people moaning about playing the same maps over and over which have been voted. So here's a idea -

Lets face it, de_cbble is never played and de_forge is the same layout as de_cbble but more compact and better fps.
So it would make sense too remove de_cbble and add de_forge (More fun in my opinion).

Also removing de_cpl_mill would be an obvious delete due too de_tuscan played instead of this.

De_cache(enjoyable map) and css_overpass are of course played very often in CSGO.. but there are cs 1.6 versions of these maps and could be added if people wanted them.

OK, Peoples thoughts?

[Image: cs-62-de_forge.jpg]

RE: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - Marcus - 06-15-2022

i'm in about de_forge, it would be a nice twist up since cbble is never played.
about cache, for sure will be so laggy for low fps players.
lets hear from arabian players too,

RE: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - spectrum - 06-15-2022

I have played de_cache and css_overpass and I liked both maps. About overpass, it'd have to be learned to be played as a team since it's quite hard to find that map on the servers currently online. De_cache is still being played and I think it'd be easier to be played. About de_forge, NGL, i have never played it but from the pics it really looks like de_cbble but smaller. Which would solve cbble's problem. Because de_cbble is really big. Would rather have de_cobblestone than de_cbble on the servers.

I like the overall idea.

Also, de_cpl_mill should be removed. Doesn't make any sense when there's Tuscan.

RE: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - Ayoub Dz - 06-16-2022

Hello,
I vote for cache

RE: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - zykooo - 06-16-2022

I would love to see de_cache on servers, and i suggest adding de_lite instead of de_aztec or de_dust since no one votes for them.

RE: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - señorVac - 06-17-2022

I think adding overpass and cache is a good idea,

cbble should be REMOVED and not REPLACED.

RE: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - inzane - 06-17-2022

have never played any of them but i say go for it! Remove de_dust and de_aztec and de_cbble

RE: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - sayonara - 06-19-2022

nothing is going to change, I already asked to delete all the maps that are useless since 2 years to Colombia, it would also be necessary to put back the minute ban when we change server but apparently nobody is able to do it, I do not know why, it is not so complicated

RE: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - Tesco Value - 06-19-2022

I've spoke too Tjaarda(tech admin) , he will add/change the maps, i just wanted too see what people think of the new maps/changes. Also i will ask about the 1minute ban etc

RE: Should we add de_forge, de_cache, css_overpass - Em1RaK - 06-20-2022

i guess im late to give my opinion about this , however for me i think cache and lite would be the best alternatives for a change .